Pick the situation and how many exchanges you want. The AI plays the student; you lead the conversation. The simulation never depicts an emergency in progress and never goes into method detail or graphic content. At the end you get a per-dimension evaluation of the conversation — not of a clinical judgement — with verbatim quotes of what you actually said and one concrete action per dimension.
You will be speaking with
The student
Each situation starts the counterpart somewhere different.
Each round = one of your responses + the customer's reply. The final round wraps the interaction naturally.
Review panel
Who comments on your performance at the end
Carlos Miranda Levy · Billy · Naila · Ainthony will review your session.
About this rubric
The rubric leans on the OECD Teaching Compass 2025. This is formative professional practice for trained school staff: it is not therapy, it is not a screening or diagnostic tool, it accredits and certifies nothing, and it does not replace the institution's own safeguarding protocol, which governs every real disclosure. The evaluation judges the conversation — confidentiality limits stated honestly, the student's pace, and correct, proportionate escalation — and never rules on whether a clinical judgement was right or wrong. The simulation depicts no emergency in progress, no method detail and no graphic content; faced with real risk, trigger your institution's protocol immediately.
Formative practice only. No certification, accreditation or diagnosis follows from it.